Wednesday, April 24, 2013

Don't forget about North Korea


With the recent Boston Marathon bombing tragedy the North Korean threats have moved to second place.  However, as a country we are still dealing with the North Korean threats and nothing has been settled yet, but it seems as if things are quietly diminishing. 

This all started back in February when North Korea decided to conduct a third nuclear test leading the United Nations Security Council to propose tougher sanctions against the country.  As a result of these proposed sanctions North Korea became very direct and threatening with the potential use of nuclear weapons towards South Korea, the U.S. and other Asian neighbors such as Japan.  The latest threats from North Korea include U.S. territories such as Washington D.C. as well as states such as Colorado and Arkansas. 

These threats seem alarming at first, but there is clear evidence that North Korea may not have the capability to accurately pinpoint its weapons to its desired locations.  According to a Huffington Post article, in a recent North Korean propaganda video Colorado Springs, CO was mentioned as a desired target, but the arrow used to show the missile traveling from North Korea to Colorado Springs happens to be located on top of Little Rock, AR. 

In March, New York Times writer Choe Sang-Hun reported that the South Korean military released a statement regarding the North’s threats saying “If North Korea attempts a provocation that threatens the lives and security of our people, our military will forcefully and decisively strike not only the origin of provocation and its supporting forces but also its command leadership.” 

North Korea has the weapon power to launch a missile capable of reaching the United States, but many believe these threats are just another attempt to be recognized and sustain power, and so that leader Kim-Jong-un can get national attention in order to possibly help his poor, starving country.  Other people believe that it is all a big misunderstanding and that the parties involved are too stubborn to just civilly settle things. 

For example, in a BBC News article released in March Professor John Delury of South Korean's Yonsei University said that if you look at past instances similar to this one or times where things have happened there have always been clear warning signs from the North.  He believes that the U.S. snd South Korea misread the North's intentions and misunderstand its capabilities, causing the U.S. and South Korea to be stuck in a North Korean quagmire. 

The latest threat that government officials and authorities were worried about was a possible missile launch on April 15 because North Korea celebrated Jong-un's grandfather's 101 birthday (Kim Il-sung).  However, no launches or anything threatening has occurred.  Although nothing major has occurred in the past week or so the U.S. and South Korea are still on high alert.

Remember, North Korea may not have the technology to accurately attack the U.S. but there are more than 28,000 U.S. troops based in South Korea which is the easiest target.  There are also another 40,000 U.S. troops in Japan and a large military base in Guam, both easy targets for a North Korean missile.  Not to mention, if Japan was affected by a launch the U.S. is obliged to help defend them due to the post-World War II security alliance between Washington and Tokyo. 
  (plan to incorporate audio of interviews with political science teachers and students)
    -also incorporate these into the writing
(plan to add photos of Kim-Jong-un and North Korean missiles, etc.)
-also want to add in graphics of missle range and targets
       
 
 
 

2 comments:

  1. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Great start and very informational! You could tighten your organization by bringing the difference in experts' opinion (N. Korea as threat/not a threat) higher up in your article. Do review AP Style rules, esp. on state abbreviations. Your links could be more effective and consistent (use them every time you reference another website). Also try using a phrase for a hyperlink: for example, "clear evidence that North Korea may not have the capability" rather than "capability."

    ReplyDelete